{

• -
  "types": [
  • "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#NamedIndividual"
  ],
• "prefLabel": null,
• -
  "label": [
  • "out of scope"
  ],
• -
  "properties": {
  • -
    "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type": [
    • "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#NamedIndividual"
    ],
  • -
    "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label": [
    • "out of scope"
    ],
  • -
    "http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000115": [
    • "The term was added to the ontology on the assumption it was in scope, but it turned out later that it was not."
    ],
  • -
    "http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000117": [
    • "http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5208-3432"
    ],
  • -
    "http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000116": [
    • "This obsolesence reason should be used conservatively. Typical valid examples are: un-necessary grouping classes in disease ontologies, a phenotype term added on the assumption it was a disease."
    ],
  • -
    "http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000233": [
    • "https://github.com/information-artifact-ontology/ontology-metadata/issues/77"
    ],
  • -
    "http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000234": [
    • "https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5208-3432"
    ]
  },
• "@id": "http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OMO_0001000",
• "@type": "http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#NamedIndividual",
• -
  "@context": {
  • "@vocab": "http://data.bioontology.org/metadata/",
  • "label": "http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label",
  • "prefLabel": "http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#prefLabel",
  • "types": "http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#type",
  • "@language": "en"
  }

}